How Proof of Stake (PoS) is Similar to Issuing Securities (Stocks)

Generated by OpenAI DALL-E

Proof of stake (PoS) is a type of consensus mechanism used by some blockchain networks to validate transactions and add new blocks to the blockchain. It is an alternative to proof of work (PoW), which is the most widely used consensus mechanism in the cryptocurrency industry.

One way in which PoS is similar to issuing securities is that it involves the allocation of ownership or decision-making power within a blockchain network. In PoS, network participants (called “validators”) are chosen to validate transactions and create new blocks based on the size of their stake in the network, which is typically measured in the native cryptocurrency of the network.

This allocation of ownership or decision-making power is similar to the way that securities represent an ownership stake in a company or a claim on part of its assets or earnings. For example, when a company issues stocks, it is essentially allocating ownership of a portion of the company to the stockholders, who are then entitled to a share of the company’s profits and assets. Similarly, when a blockchain network allocates ownership or decision-making power based on stake size, it is essentially giving validators a say in how the network is run and how its resources are allocated.

Another way in which PoS is similar to issuing securities is that it often involves the sale of tokens or other digital assets to raise funds for the development and maintenance of the network. In some cases, these tokens may be considered securities under certain circumstances, depending on how they are structured and marketed. For example, if the tokens are marketed as a way to participate in the profits or assets of the network, or if they are marketed as an investment in the future success of the network, they may be considered securities.

In conclusion, while PoS is not a security in and of itself, it does have some similarities to issuing securities in terms of the allocation of ownership or decision-making power and the potential sale of tokens or other digital assets to raise funds. However, whether or not a particular PoS-based project is considered a security would depend on the specific facts and circumstances of the project, and would need to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis by the relevant regulatory authorities.

Why Ethereum is a Captured Project, But It Doesn’t Matter

Image Source: Canva

The inevitable already happened. Ethereum is a captured project by the US government: Tornado Cash, 45% of the Ethereum validators now follow the US Sanctions, and more to come.

The Fall of Ethereum’s Tornado Cash

A few weeks ago, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control – also known as OFAC – sanctioned Tornado Cash. This cryptocurrency mixer mixes cryptocurrencies together to make it hard to track their history. Unfortunately, Tornado Cash is easy to suppress because its developers are known and its frontend servers are hosted on US soil.

Let’s Not Pretend It’s Not A Security

Ethereum is a security based on the Howey Test. It’s like a company because of proof-of-stake. The more you have, the more influence you have over the network. It’s the recreation of the current system. The more shares you have within a company, the more power you have over a company’s direction or decisions.
If you have no problem with that, it doesn’t matter if Ethereum is a captured project just as it doesn’t matter if you buy one or two TSLA stock or a stock market index like QQQ or VTI.